Is the majority always right? Young children's normative interpretations of majority and dissenting peer behavior
نویسندگان
چکیده
The present study investigates the social-cognitive underpinnings of young children's bias to follow majority. More specifically, we focus on question whether children not only copy behavior a majority peers, but they also understand this as social norm that everyone needs follow. Additionally, investigated seeing unanimous or and dissenting peer makes difference for normative understanding. Participants included 180 preschool-age (4-to-5 years old) who engaged in conformity paradigm, where either saw additionally single peer, two individual peers behaving differently (Control). Afterward, mostly copied protested against others, when deviated from majority, thus indeed interpreting others need However, had seen well dissenter, protest copying favor dropped. Overall, our findings show preschool interpret normative. see dissenter's behavior, interpretation is weakened.
منابع مشابه
Does the Majority Always Know Best? Young Children's Flexible Trust in Majority Opinion
Copying the majority is generally an adaptive social learning strategy but the majority does not always know best. Previous work has demonstrated young children's selective uptake of information from a consensus over a lone dissenter. The current study examined children's flexibility in following the majority: do they overextend their reliance on this heuristic to situations where the dissentin...
متن کاملMajority Consensus and the Local Majority Rule
we only show one further result that emphasizes our point that understanding LMP is fundamental to understanding any generalization of this process. A simple generalization of the local majority process would allow vertex v to have some resistivity towards color switch. Formally, for a nonnegative integer kv, we de ne a kv-local majority rule for vertex v: ct+1 v = ( ctv if jfw 2 Nv : ctw = ctv...
متن کاملThe Copenhagen Adduction Exercise is not Applied by the Majority of Professional and Semi-Professional Soccer Players and Coaches
Background. Groin injuries are frequent and commonly seen in soccer. The Copenhagen Adduction Exercise (CAE) increases eccentric hip adduction strength and reduces the groin injury incident. Objectives. To assess the professional and semi-professional soccer players and coaches’ awareness, implementation, and opinion of the CAE. Methods. A cross-sectional study based on a survey consisting of...
متن کاملThe majority game with an arbitrary majority
The k-majority game is played with n numbered balls, each coloured with one of two colours. It is given that there are at least k balls of the majority colour, where k is a fixed integer greater than n/2. On each turn the player selects two balls to compare, and it is revealed whether they are of the same colour; the player’s aim is to determine a ball of the majority colour. It has been correc...
متن کاملIs Majority Consistency Possible? By
The most well-known approaches to decision rules are inspired by "majority-based" and "ranking-based” utilitarianism. The long lasting discussion on the appropriate collective decision mechanism is based on the merits of the rules consistent with these two approaches. Focusing on conformity with qualified majority, we propose SingleApproval Multiple-Rejection (SAMR) as a plausible flexible scor...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Social Development
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['0961-205X', '1467-9507']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12682